![]() FastStone can view and edit pictures, but it can also convert and rename files, make slideshows, and process multiple images at once. ![]() FastStone also has more complicated features like managing colors, getting rid of red eyes, and comparing images. The software has many tools and features, such as the ability to crop, resize, and change the color and contrast of an image. It works with many different picture formats and lets users view, edit, and organize their image files. What is Faststone?įastStone Image Viewer is a free program for Windows that can be used to view and change images. It can be used on Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms. XnView also lets you do simple things like resize, crop, change the brightness and contrast, and add filters and effects. It lets people look through, organize, and look at their picture files in different ways, like full-screen mode and slideshows. XnView is free software that can be used to view and convert more than 500 different picture formats. Re: Comparing XnView MP / FastStone Image Viewer. Xnview vs Faststone Comparison Table SpecificationīMP, JPEG, JPEG 2000, GIF, PNG, PCX, TIFF, WMF, ICO, TGA In the end, the choice between the two will come down to what the person wants and needs. ![]() Both XnView and FastStone have loyal users, but XnView is more popular with people who like open-source software and FastStone is more popular with people who use Windows. It is also known for having an easy-to-use layout. FastStone has a lot of features, such as changing colors, tagging images, and cropping. ![]() XnView works with more than 500 picture formats, can process images in batches, and can be used in more than one language. XnView is a free, open-source picture viewer, while FastStone is a paid program that you can try for free. Both have advanced features that let you change and organize images. Maybe I don't belong to the target group of FRW either.XnView and FastStone can be used to view and edit pictures. XnViwe MP offers the increase of the gamma value, which is of course only conditionally useful. And unfortunately that doesn't work with JPGs. I want to be able to judge quickly whether the motive of the photo is successful, whether it is halfway sharp and which photo is the best for a series of pictures.Įverything else I can optimize in other programs.įor this evaluation I only need JPGs and I want to see them without delay (especially when jumping back and forth between series of pictures).Īnd as I often photograph indoors, I have many underexposed RAW files whose exposure is adjusted as automatically as possible. Because basically the display of the RAW and JPG files is faster than with Lightroom or C1.īut what is the advantage of viewing the RAW file? I suppose that many users use the program to evaluate their RAW files in order to process them in other programs. The question is, of course, what do you want or what do others do with FRW? In addition, the exposure correction is no longer available to me and I need this regularly. But FRW doesn't get much faster if I change the display to embedded JPG. I had already thought that there was an essential difference. What do the programs do differently than FRW? This is an enormous time saving for the regular viewing of many photos (up to 10000). But with XnView MP I can go back and forth between the RAW files very fast, felt without any time delay, the photo is immediately displayed sharply. I've already tried everything, be it prefetching or faster display of FUJI RAW files (Fuji X-T3).īut nothing has helped: the display is always noticeably slower, of course I can't quantify it exactly in milliseconds. The program has currently replaced FRW in my case.īecause I actually think the operating concept for FastRawViewer is better and I would like to know how I can make FastRawViewer display RAW files as fast as XnView MP. Until a few days ago, I was a big fan of FastRawViewer , but now I have again tested some "oldtimers" for sorting my RAW files, especially XNView MP, Honey View and FastStone Picture Viewer and to my surprise I had to realize that all three programs display RAW files (compressed and separate JPG) noticeably faster than FastRawViewer.Įspecially XnView MP makes this very convincing and offers all functions for marking the files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |